Search

Shannon Berry

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
55 matches · 34W–21L · seasons 20192025
Where Shannon sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Shannon is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shannon has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Shannon has gone from the 85th to the 60th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
74.2%
23W–8L · 58.8% of games
4.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.8% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history55 matches
W
2025-05-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jopie van Hameren
+0.010better than expected — took 58% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Collins
+0.010better than expected — took 59% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
Sammie Sue Willenborg / Karen Groenweghe
2025-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vivian Nguyen
0.016below expectation — took 48% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-01-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heike Droste
0.002about as expected — took 68% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cara Williams
0.024below expectation — took 35% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2024-08-24 · #3 Doubles · with Jen Lewis
+0.018better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Jlynn Spitz / Kelli Gerischamps
2024-08-23 · #2 Doubles · with Laura Maginnis
0.011below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Elizabeth Arwood / Elise D Harvey
2024-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dalika Crawford
+0.002better than expected — took 86% of games against 73% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Amy Patton / Rachel Nies
2024-05-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Maginnis
0.055below expectation — took 56% of games against 73% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dalika Crawford
0.008about as expected — took 59% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2024-04-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Collins
+0.025better than expected — took 92% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Jennifer Salnas / Jen Westchamps
2023-08-26 · #3 Doubles · with Jen Lewis
+0.038better than expected — took 57% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.