← Search

Rachael Barnard

Kula, HI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 45W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachael Barnard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
L
2026-07-05 · The Net Set · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jori Spencer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-04 · The Net Set · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Sayles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · The Net Set · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-25 · #4 Doubles · with Stephanie Carlsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-4
L
2026-03-30 · Mike 7.0-4 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Tobita mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · Mike 7.0-4 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Andrew Lacaden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-14 · Mike 7.0-4 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Don Booth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-01 · Mike 7.0-4 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Tobita mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-21 · Mike's 3.5W #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Thorson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Amy Albert / Jennifer Hutchings
2026-02-18 · Maui Match Makers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Sayles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-02-14 · Mike's 3.5W #1 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Devereux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-24 · Mike's 3.5W #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erika Varcak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
52.8%
19W–17L · 50.7% of games
3.5
18.5%
5W–22L · 36.3% of games
6.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 64% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 46.9% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 69.7% of games
7.0mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 38.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#1 Female Doubles
9%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer