Naveed Irfani
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Woodland Hills, CA
73 matches · 30W–43L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history73 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2024
LLW Wood Ranch Deuce Busters Garen Amirganian
SFV - Deuce Busters
SFV - Knights At Court
V-LLW Wood Ranch Deuce Busters - Amirganian
SFV - Deuce Busters
SFV - Perfect Mix
SFV Acers
SFV - Acers
SFV - Acers
SFV - Deuce Busters
SFV - Trilogy
SFV LLW - Acers - Lee Tsai
SFV LLW - Magnificent 7 - Larissa Kazantsev
SFV Magnificent 7
LLW - SFV Acers - Lee Tsai
LLW - SFV Magnificent 7- Larissa Kazantsev
SFV-Acers
SFV-LLW - Acers - Lee Tsai
SFV-LLW - Magnificent 7 - Larissa Kazantsev
SFV-Triple Trouble
V - LLW-RanchoMaderaSliders-Kopooshian
V - Rancho Madera Sliders
SFV Acers
SFV Magnificent 7
SFV. Internetters
SFV -Mixed Nuts
SFV Acers
SFV Ball Breakers LLWS Delia Holguin Warner Center
SFV LATPA
SFV LLWS Ball Breakers Delia Holguin Warner Center
SFV Mixed Nuts
V - WR Warriors
V - Wood Ranch Dukes
V - Wood Ranch Warriors
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
41.7%
15W–21L · 47.3% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.2% of games
2.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 35.7% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 49.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
12 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.