← Search

Barry Fredericks

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Kent, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
9 matches · 3W–6L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history9 matches
L
2026-02-28 · JTC-Clarke-Tennis Nuts · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Weiser
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-07 · JTC-Clarke-Tennis Nuts · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Gavigan
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-01-31 · JTC-Clarke-Tennis Nuts · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Perry Cooper
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-03 · JTC-Clarke-Tennis Nuts · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barry Johnson
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-06 · JTC-Clarke-Sr Acorns · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Kozuma
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-22 · JTC-Clarke-Sr Acorns · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clemente Villalobos
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-08 · JTC-Clarke-Sr Acorns · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Johnson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-01 · JTC-Clarke-Sr Acorns · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clemente Villalobos
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-04 · JTC-Clarke-Sr Acorns · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Johnson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 36.6% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe