Search

Alicia Follmer

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
46 matches · 20W–26L · seasons 20192025
Where Alicia sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Alicia is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Alicia has been a steady 3.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Alicia has gone from the 28th to the 44th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.5
44.4%
20W–25L · 49.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history46 matches
L
2025-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Crabtree Martin
0.007below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Crabtree Martin
+0.010better than expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Raub
0.007about as expected — took 38% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2024-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miri Rogers
0.015below expectation — took 45% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miri Rogers
+0.000about as expected — took 40% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Michelle Calquhoun / Courtney Brown
2024-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Raub
+0.032better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2024-04-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Raub
0.051below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-03-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Apostolou
+0.044better than expected — took 67% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Kayla Evans / Zoe Garrett
2024-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darci Wyman
0.029below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Emily Ishado / Cynthia Padilla
2024-01-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trisna Tanus
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-01-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Raub
0.005about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Youngmee Kim / Ethel Brende
2023-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Raub
0.000about as expected — took 40% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.