← Search

Molly Hunter

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
132 matches · 74W–58L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.94
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
78%
down to 4.0
22%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 52% down · 48% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.00. Higher than today’s 3.94 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.5
86 of 103
WA · 4.5
300 of 364

Molly is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Molly has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.54.04.5201920212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Molly has gone from the 61st to the 11th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
82.1%
23W–5L · 62.3% of games
4.5
49%
25W–26L · 50.9% of games
9.0
80%
8W–2L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.4% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matthew Allen
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 48% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dayna Guizzetti
−0.016about as expected — took 58% of games against 63% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-09-27 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Anne Medzegian
−0.010below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-06 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Susan Lammers
−0.010about as expected — took 63% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-08-23 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Kohler
+0.005about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Foster
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Brooke Cordova
+0.008about as expected — took 57% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Kohler
+0.026better than expected — took 47% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Kohler
−0.006below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Swets
−0.031below expectation — took 58% of games against 67% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-03-29 · #3 Doubles · with Brooke Cordova
+0.028better than expected — took 56% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Hood
+0.018better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.