← Search

Daniel Jacques

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greer, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
196 matches · 127W–69L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history196 matches
W
2026-09-20 · UPTA40C/Meredith/ACAC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Meredith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-13 · UPTA40C/Meredith/ACAC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Meredith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-30 · UPTA40C/Meredith/ACAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Adam Thompson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-29 · UPTA55C/Falciatano/ACAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cesar Manent
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-16 · UPTA40C/Meredith/ACAC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Meredith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-3
W
2026-08-08 · UPTA55C/Falciatano/ACAC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matt Kowalec
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · UPTA40C/Meredith/ACAC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Meredith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-05-03 · UPTA40A/Babcock/ACAC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brad Meredith
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-04-19 · UPTA40A/Babcock/ACAC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Szabo
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-26 · UPTA40A/Babcock/ACAC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Babcock
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-24 · UPTA18A/Hunter/ACAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Tant
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-22 · UPTA40A/Babcock/ACAC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harvinder Sidhu
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 61.3% of games
4.0
61%
50W–32L · 54.6% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 41.3% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
72.4%
21W–8L · 56.8% of games
8.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 53.5% of games
4.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 67% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.4% of games
8.0mixed
65.4%
17W–9L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
52 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams