← Search

Marc Rubinstein

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chattanooga, TN
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 68W–70L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history138 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Vachon/Chattanooga · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Jennifer Hammargren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-19 · Lau · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Richard
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharel Hooper mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharel Hooper mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharel Hooper mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharel Hooper mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · Vachon/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharel Hooper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · Vachon/Chattanooga · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharel Hooper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · Vachon/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharel Hooper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-29 · Vachon/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharel Hooper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-28 · Young/Chattanooga · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Bagley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-07 · Young/Chattanooga · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucynda Cynda Holmes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
76.5%
26W–8L · 60.3% of games
4.0
33.3%
14W–28L · 40.6% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 61.4% of games
7.5
50%
6W–6L · 51.4% of games
0.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50.4% of games
4.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 44.6% of games
7.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 63% of games
8.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
42 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams