← Search

Brittany Padgett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Mill, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
230 matches · 147W–83L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history230 matches
L
2026-09-25 · KCrane (Palisades) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Carnahan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-09-18 · KCrane (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cecile Yager
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-28 · KCrane (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Cass
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · LMonty/JRuggiero (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Walker
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-10 · JGluff (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Usina
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-30 · LMonty/JRuggiero (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Lundberg
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · JGluff (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Hart
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-09 · LMonty/JRuggiero (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Walker
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-17 · JLundberg (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Gluff
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-03 · JLundberg (Palisades) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Hart
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-22 · MCTA18/HartB/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Candler
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-03-20 · JLundberg (Palisades) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Hart
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
50%
5W–5L · 51.3% of games
3.5
77.6%
38W–11L · 61.8% of games
4.0
55.6%
35W–28L · 50.8% of games
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.4% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 58.8% of games
7.5
69%
49W–22L · 54.6% of games
8.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 49.6% of games
4.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.4% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
54 matches
#1 Singles
9%
21 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova