← Search

Christopher Kayser

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 24W–28L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christopher Kayser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-02-07 · IRV-Kayser/Chandler · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-06 · IRV-Boyer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Hendrickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-24 · IRV-Kayser/Chandler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-01-18 · IRV-Kayser/Chandler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Kohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-04 · IRV-Kayser/Chandler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-06-15 · IRV-Hoerster · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with ANTHONY PEPE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-26 · IRV-Hoerster · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Kohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-03-15 · IRV-Hoerster · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Kohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-02 · IRV-Hoerster · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with ANTHONY PEPE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-02-22 · IRV-Hoerster · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Burkhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-01-26 · IRV-Hoerster · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-01-03 · IRV-Hoerster · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Kohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2014–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
47.6%
20W–22L · 47.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams