← Search

Patricia Holt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Jupiter, FL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 35W–24L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history59 matches
W
2024-04-13 · NPB/Berqquist/40&Over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Werner
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-03-09 · NPB/Berqquist/40&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Ferguson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2024-03-02 · NPB/Berqquist/40&Over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Bergquist
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-02-17 · NPB/Berqquist/40&Over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Bergquist
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2024-02-10 · NPB/Berqquist/40&Over3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Ferguson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
Kathleen Murphy / Beth Stewart
2023-08-11 · Jupiter Country Club- Holzman · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Ferguson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2023-07-28 · Jupiter Country Club- Holzman · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Ferguson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-05 · Jupiter Country Club- Holzman · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chelie Casey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-06-23 · FIG GARDEN 18AW4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Le
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2021-06-16 · FIG GARDEN 18AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Insun Janigian
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2021-06-09 · FIG GARDEN 18AW4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2020-02-13 · FIG GARDEN 40AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terry Babcock
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
91.3%
21W–2L · 64.1% of games
4.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 52.2% of games
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.1% of games
7.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.9% of games
8.0
20%
1W–4L · 39.1% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
14 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer