← Search

Tina Odessa

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pawtucket, RI
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 21W–25L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history46 matches
L
2026-07-02 · RW: Nevers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jillian Torgan
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · RW: Nevers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gabriella Della Corte
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · RW: Nevers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Healy
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-03 · RW: Nevers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Healy
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-02 · CC: McVay · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dawn Friedkin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 1-6, 1-4
L
2025-06-21 · CC: McVay · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Connie Howes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 2-6, 1-6
W
2024-08-21 · CC: Grand Slam/McVay · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelley Berger
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2024-08-12 · CC: Grand Slam/McVay · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelley Berger
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-08-10 · CC: Grand Slam/McVay · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Dressler
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-3
L
2024-07-28 · CC: McVay · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacqueline McKinney
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-3
L
2024-07-11 · CC: McVay · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Dressler
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-09 · CC: Grand Slam/McVay · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Connie Howes
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 2-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
46.2%
12W–14L · 44% of games
6.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 50% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer