← Search

Emily Gessner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Beverly Hills, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
216 matches · 144W–72L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history216 matches
W
2026-10-24 · PINE-Refka 8.5W Weekend Combo F · #3 Doubles · with Catherine Christian
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-16 · PINE-Refka 8.5W Weekend Combo F · #3 Doubles · with Julie Webb
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-10-10 · PINE-Refka 8.5W Weekend Combo F · #3 Doubles · with Julie Webb
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-15 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maggie Knight
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-17 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Olivia Underwood
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Enright
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-04 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maggie Knight
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · PINE-Knight (inside) 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sali Refka
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-21 · TROY-Strachan Tri MED Women F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Davis
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-01 · TROY-Strachan Tri MED Women F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maggie Knight
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-11-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katie Lowe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
50%
5W–5L · 52.6% of games
3.5
100%
26W–0L · 73.6% of games
4.0
88.2%
45W–6L · 69.9% of games
4.5
43.9%
25W–32L · 46.1% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 67.4% of games
7.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.7% of games
8.5
55%
11W–9L · 50.3% of games
9.0
80%
4W–1L · 53.3% of games
9.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
54.5%
12W–10L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
45 matches
#2 Singles
17%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
27 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova