← Search

Andrew Wagner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 79W–48L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history127 matches
W
2026-10-16 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW White · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eric Peterson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-10-09 · NIN FW Combo 75 M: WW White/French · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jay Stanchin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-03 · NIN FW 18&O Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 M: WW White · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cosimo Lombardi
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-26 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW White · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Greg Salway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-20 · NIN FW 18&O Tri-Level 3.0,3.5,4.0 M: WW White · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Steve White
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-19 · NIN MXD 40&O 6.0: White/Jakacki · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Poe mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · NIN FW MXD 18&O 6.0: White · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Poe mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-18 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW White · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandon Fehn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-11 · NIN FW Combo 6.5 M: WW White · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Spitzer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-23 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW White/Wagner · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Nichols championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW White/Wagner · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Cowan championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-22 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW White/Wagner · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Bussick championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 33.8% of games
3.5
72.6%
45W–17L · 58.6% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
54.5%
12W–10L · 55% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 44.4% of games
6.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 60.1% of games
7.0mixed
45.8%
11W–13L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
27 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
7 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova