← Search

Timothy Bussick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Wayne, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 77W–37L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history114 matches
L
2026-09-19 · NIN FW A 55&O 7.0 M: WW White · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve White championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-6
W
2026-08-23 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW White/Wagner · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jimmy Brown championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW White/Wagner · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vijay Kamineni championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-22 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW White/Wagner · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Wagner championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-21 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW White/Wagner · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Wagner championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · NIN FW 1&O 3.5 M: WW White/Wagner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Wagner championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-08 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW White/Wagner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Li championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-02 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW White/Wagner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Li championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-01 · NIN FW 1&O 3.5 M: WW White/Wagner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Wagner championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-20 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW White/Wagner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Wagner
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-13 · NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW White/Wagner · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abner Mendador
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · NIN FW 18&O 4.0 M: WW White/Loera · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Zank
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
65.6%
40W–21L · 55.5% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.7% of games
6.5
100%
11W–0L · 64.5% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 63.3% of games
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 58.6% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 42% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 63.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams