← Search

Janis Locenieks

Beaverton, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 43W–21L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janis Locenieks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-08-09 · Locenieks · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-02 · Locenieks · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-02-22 · WHRC-Lipke · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stanley Mo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · WHRC-Lipke · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-23 · WHRC-Lipke · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-01-17 · WHRC-Lipke · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Humpage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-09-14 · Locenieks · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-09-06 · Locenieks · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-08-10 · Locenieks · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-05-04 · WHRC-Lofts · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-04-27 · WHRC-Lofts · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Simon Lofts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-04-12 · WHRC-Lofts · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Simon Lofts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2015–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
69.1%
38W–17L · 56% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.1% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 41% of the time
#1 Singles
41%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
8 matches
#2 Singles
8%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams