← Search

Claire le Cheminant

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
259 matches · 169W–90L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history259 matches
L
2026-09-27 · LCTA39/Clark/MPR · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Irina Bordyn
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-02 · LCTA18/LeCheminant/MPR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Valerie Mehta
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · LCTA40/LeCheminant/Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen Clark
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-24 · LCTA40/LeCheminant/Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandy Mcmahon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · LCTA18/LeCheminant/MPR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen Clark
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-18 · LCTA18/LeCheminant/MPR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen Clark
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · LCTA40/LeCheminant/Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen Clark
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-27 · LCTA40/LeCheminant/Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Olga Haefele
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · LCTA40/LeCheminant/Hamlin · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Pernell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-11 · LCTA40/Wiggins/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandy Mcmahon
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · LCTA40/Wiggins/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annmarie Taggio
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-16 · LCTA40/Wiggins/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annmarie Taggio
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 73% of games
3.0
87.5%
56W–8L · 68.7% of games
3.5
85.7%
24W–4L · 62.3% of games
4.0
40.2%
33W–49L · 48.3% of games
5.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 65.4% of games
6.5
93.3%
14W–1L · 64.9% of games
7.5
52.9%
18W–16L · 48.6% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 58.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
102 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
96 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
49 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams