← Search

Dina Meng

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Orlando, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 62W–51L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history113 matches
W
2026-05-01 · Ft Gatlin-Massad · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mario Massad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · Ft Gatlin-Massad · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mario Massad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · Ft. Gatlin-Luter-TennisCloud/RTT · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Sheedy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-31 · Fort Gatlin-Fontaine · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robin Bradford
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-01-25 · Ft. Gatlin-Luter-TennisCloud/RTT · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Sheedy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-01-24 · Fort Gatlin-Fontaine · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Beachy
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-06-05 · Sanlando-Dierkes Sugar · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-05-23 · Sanlando-Dierkes Sugar · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Yahn
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-04-18 · Sanlando-Dierkes Sugar · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-04 · Sanlando-Dierkes Sugar · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-07 · Sanlando-Dierkes · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-28 · Sanlando-Dierkes · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 52.1% of games
3.5
88.2%
15W–2L · 68.9% of games
4.0
46.2%
24W–28L · 45.6% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.7% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
16 matches
Singles
9%
10 matches
#2 Singles
8%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal