← Search

Jill Beachy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Orlando, FL
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 43W–30L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history73 matches
W
Default
2026-03-07 · Fort Gatlin-Fontaine · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with April Wagner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-01-24 · Fort Gatlin-Fontaine · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dina Meng
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-11-22 · Orange/Barritt/Combo18&Over8.5W · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Angela Larisey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-11-08 · Florida/Tuckerman/55 & Over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Penny Watzka championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-04 · Orange/Barritt/Combo18&Over8.5W · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amanda Barritt
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2024-08-23 · USTA Campus-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alisa Wolfe
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-5
W
2024-08-16 · USTA Campus-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rochele Ogden
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-08-01 · USTA Campus-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alisa Wolfe
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-07-13 · OrangeSeminole/Reich/40&Over4.0W · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-12 · USTA Campus-Barritt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rochele Ogden
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-05-24 · OrangeSeminole/Reich/40&Over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Gelina
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2024-04-29 · Florida/Tuckerman/55 & Over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Widga-Kirby championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 53.9% of games
4.0
65.2%
15W–8L · 57.3% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 53.9% of games
8.0
90%
9W–1L · 67.3% of games
8.5
0%
0W–5L · 33.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually Singles, 29% of the time
Singles
29%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova