← Search

Gary Scharf

— year-end
24 matches · 11W–13L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Gary Scharf to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2021-05-08 · MAD:4.0 Mad Men 40&:Sobolewski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Sobolewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2021-04-18 · MAD:4.0 Mad Men 40&:Sobolewski · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2021-04-11 · MAD:4.0 Mad Men 40&:Sobolewski · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Sobolewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2020-11-15 · MAD:4.0 Mad Men:Sobolewski · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2020-10-04 · MAD:4.0 Mad Men:Sobolewski · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Stanton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Donald Parker / David Peterson
2019-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vivek Parwani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2019-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Niejadlik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2019-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Niejadlik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2019-05-11 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2019-05-04 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Stephen Sasson
2019-04-28 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2019-04-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Bowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams2 teams · 2021–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 52.9% of games
4.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 50% of the time
#1 Singles
50%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal