← Search

Kyle Francis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
PFLUGERVILLE, TX
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 122W–19L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history141 matches
W
2026-05-17 · Jackson/Francis/LR/CCLR · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Johnson championship
loading the estimate
2-3
L
2026-05-16 · Jackson/Francis/LR/CCLR · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Johnson championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-18 · Jackson/Francis/LR/CCLR · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Johnson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-26 · Jackson/Francis/LR/CCLR · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jacob McDaniels
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Doshier mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-09-26 · Mesaris/LR/Reb · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Luis Nunez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-09-25 · Mesaris/LR/Reb · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jonathan Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-09-23 · Mesaris/LR/Reb · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Todd Dunn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-09-19 · Mesaris/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jonathan Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-08-13 · Patel/LR/BP · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robin Show
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-07-29 · McVinney/Walls/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jenni Orahood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2024-07-10 · Patel/LR/BP · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Makris
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
97.9%
46W–1L · 67.9% of games
4.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 61% of games
7.5
100%
15W–0L · 67.8% of games
8.5
75%
15W–5L · 60.7% of games
4.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.5% of games
7.0mixed
100%
18W–0L · 75.9% of games
8.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 63.3% of games
9.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
42 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert