← Search

Jill Cox

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Spring, TX
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 91W–40L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history131 matches
L
2026-10-18 · Carlton Woods · #4 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeremy Cox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-27 · Carlton Woods · #4 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeremy Cox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Default
2026-09-20 · Carlton Woods · #4 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeremy Cox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-09 · Hill-Hilltop Hitters-Woodlands Parks · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Middleton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-26 · Hill-Hilltop Hitters-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Howe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · Hill-Hilltop Hitters-Woodlands Parks · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth von Bodungen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-12-08 · Battle-Lucky Strings-Bear Branch Park · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Nunes
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-11-29 · Carlton Woods - Couples Therapy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeremy Cox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-11-16 · Carlton Woods - Couples Therapy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeremy Cox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-05 · Sprague - Cranebrook Park · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Aichinger
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-29 · Battle-Lucky Strings-Bear Branch Park · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Barnwell
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-26 · Carlton Woods - Couples Therapy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeremy Cox mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 61.9% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
78.5%
51W–14L · 62.1% of games
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.2% of games
7.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 59.7% of games
8.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 42.3% of games
8.0mixed
56%
14W–11L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
18 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams