← Search

Coleen Niemann

Idaho Falls, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 14W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Coleen Niemann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Served Fresh* · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Dustin Woodhouse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-03 · Baseline Bandits* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhonda Rohe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-27 · Baseline Bandits* · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-20 · Baseline Bandits* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Betsy Hunsicker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · Baseline Bandits* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Betsy Hunsicker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · Baseline Bandits* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Ivie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · Idaho Falls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Jennings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-23 · Idaho Falls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · Idaho Falls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Oliver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-16 · Idaho Falls · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-05-28 · Idaho Falls · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Oliver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-21 · Idaho Falls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crista Rostrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
39.4%
13W–20L · 44.1% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 27.5% of games
5.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 22.6% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
12 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe