← Search

Ann Wagner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Scottsdale, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
308 matches · 138W–170L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history308 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Trice as Nice · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gena Luecke
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-24 · Trice as Nice · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tamra Williamson
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-06 · 4.0 VDCR3 Villagers W18F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deana Perrin
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-31 · DT- El-Con 40s · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jiang Peng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-24 · DT- El-Con 40s · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jiang Peng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-10 · DT- El-Con 40s · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jiang Peng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-03 · DT- El-Con 40s · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jiang Peng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · DT- El-Con 40s · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Keresztes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-22 · DT- El-Con 40s · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Keresztes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-03-20 · 4.0 SCR Wagner/Oakland W18Sam · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirsten Henry
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-13 · 4.0 SCR Wagner/Oakland W18Sam · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Crowe
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-27 · 4.0 SCR Wagner/Oakland W18Sam · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Crowe
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.9% of games
3.5
65.8%
52W–27L · 57.5% of games
4.0
29.3%
34W–82L · 43.2% of games
4.5
30%
3W–7L · 38.2% of games
7.5
40%
4W–6L · 43.9% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.1% of games
8.5
20%
1W–4L · 37.2% of games
4.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 47.6% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.7% of games
8.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 41.7% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 25% of the time
#2 Doubles
25%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
70 matches
#1 Singles
21%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
60 matches
Singles
9%
29 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer