← Search

Stacy Renner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
TUCSON, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
188 matches · 120W–68L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history188 matches
L
2026-10-27 · Victorious Secret · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Stuart
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-25 · Triple Threat · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Spera
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-10-25 · Triple Threat · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gaby Ritfeld
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-10-24 · Triple Threat · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Spera
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-02 · Victorious Secret · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimber Ciruli
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-25 · Victorious Secret · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Perelli-Minetti
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-14 · SAZ 40/4/5 W- Elizabeth Hing · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennie Henry championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · SAZ 40/4/5 W- Elizabeth Hing · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennie Henry championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-12 · SAZ 40/4/5 W- Elizabeth Hing · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Gavin championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · SAZ 18/4.5 W- Karen Kiburz · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Lang
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · SAZ 18/4.5 W- Karen Kiburz · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jackie Crothers
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-22 · Victorious Secret 18sp · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Perelli-Minetti
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
84.5%
71W–13L · 62% of games
4.5
39.5%
17W–26L · 47.9% of games
8.0
54.3%
25W–21L · 55.3% of games
9.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 40.9% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
35 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova