← Search

Dana Brad

Ashland, OR
3.5C year-end 2024
69 matches · 46W–23L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Dana sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Dana is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dana has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Dana has gone from the 49th to the 80th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
70.3%
26W–11L · 59.1% of games
3.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.7% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 52.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history69 matches
W
2022-04-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anca Popoaei
+0.017better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2022-03-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anca Popoaei
+0.022better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2022-03-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anca Popoaei
−0.015below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Michelle Michael / Harri Baumann
2022-01-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anca Popoaei
+0.070better than expected — took 86% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2022-01-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annette Kempf
+0.015better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2021-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cezar Ungureanasu
+0.000below expectation — took 53% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2021-08-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mihai Petriuc
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2021-08-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cezar Ungureanasu
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2021-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catalin Cozmei
+0.000better than expected — took 43% of games against 22% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2021-08-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mihai Petriuc
+0.000better than expected — took 72% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
2021-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anca Popoaei
+0.040better than expected — took 60% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
Jackie Fuller / Debbie Schrock
2021-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anca Popoaei
+0.009better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.