← Search

Lisa Zurawski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Trent Woods, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 41W–98L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history139 matches
L
2026-09-30 · EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Moore
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-30 · EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Luann Scruggs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-15 · EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Pons
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-01 · EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Catherine Hadad
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-11 · EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Catherine Hadad
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Pons
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Emerald-Roberts (55s 3.5 MX) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James McDonald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-22 · Emerald-Roberts (55s 3.5 MX) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deane Zurawski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · Emerald-Roberts (55s 3.5 MX) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rich Ferragina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-08 · Emerald-Roberts (55s 3.5 MX) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deane Zurawski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-02 · Emerald-Roberts (55s 3.5 MX) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deane Zurawski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-17 · EM-Smith (65s 3.5W SP) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Doreen Hyet
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
25%
2W–6L · 41.3% of games
3.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 35.8% of games
3.5
40.7%
22W–32L · 45.5% of games
4.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 30.7% of games
6.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 48% of games
7.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 31.5% of games
3.5mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 36.5% of games
7.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 41.2% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
24 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams