← Search

Susan Moore

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Bern, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 23W–36L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history59 matches
L
2026-09-30 · EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Zurawski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-27 · EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Luann Scruggs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-09-15 · EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Catherine Hadad
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-01 · EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Doreen Hyet
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6
L
2026-09-01 · EM-Smith Emerald Gems (55s 7.5W) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Doreen Hyet
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-16 · EM-Smith (55s 3.5W SP) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Doreen Hyet
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-10 · EM-Smith (65s 3.5W SP) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Zurawski
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-08 · EM-Smith (55s 3.5W SP) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Zurawski
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-04-02 · EM-Smith (55s 3.5W SP) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Game
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-26 · EM-Smith (55s 3.5W SP) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Smith
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · EM-Smith (55s 3.5W SP) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Smith
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-20 · EM-Smith (65s 3.5W SP) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Smith
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 50% of games
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
25%
7W–21L · 42.4% of games
6.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.6% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0%
0W–5L · 32.1% of games
3.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert