Search

BRI STECK

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2023
68 matches · 31W–37L · seasons 20212023
Where BRI sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

BRI is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

BRI has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, BRI has gone from the 37th to the 63rd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
48.2%
27W–29L · 52.9% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history68 matches
W
Leigh Ireland / Kristi Crawford
2023-03-22 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Jameson
+0.096better than expected — took 80% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Christine Beecroft / Karlene Johnston
2023-03-08 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Cottle
0.054below expectation — took 41% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Jennifer Olson / Rachael Boyle
2023-03-07 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Shank
0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Sandra Shearer / Brooke Rice
2023-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanie Wolfgramm
0.051below expectation — took 48% of games against 65% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Susan Savage / Deborah Davis
2022-11-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melodee Wilcox
0.009below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2022-11-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanie Wolfgramm
+0.001better than expected — took 86% of games against 73% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Britney Jensen / McKenzie Anderson
2022-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Shank
0.024below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Rachel Lamb / Christie Sanders
2022-11-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sonya Ladd
+0.021better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2022-11-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ally Downer
+0.040better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2022-11-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Syme
+0.026better than expected — took 44% of games against 36% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2022-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sonya Ladd
0.011below expectation — took 41% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanie Wolfgramm
+0.021better than expected — took 58% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.