Search

Adela Smith

Las Vegas, NV
2.5C year-end 2025
106 matches · 42W–64L · seasons 20192023
Where Adela sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Adela is one of 123 women at 2.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 2.5 account for 3% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams148 teams · 2001–2025
SPANISH OAKS
2025 Nta Adult 65 & Over League · 6.0 WOMEN
2025
SPANISH OAKS
2025 Usta Adult League 55 & Over · 6.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER
2025
SPANISH OAKS
2024 Nta Adult 65 & Over League · 6.0 WOMEN
2024
WHITNEY MESA PARK
2024 Usta Adult League 40 & Over · 3.0 WOMEN- 40 & OVER
2024
SPANISH OAKS
2024 Nta Fall Senior League · 6.0 WOMEN
2024
NV/WALBRIDGE/ADULT55&OVER/W7.0
2023 Usta Adult League 55 & Over · 7.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER
2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Adela has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Adela has gone from the 28th to the 56th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
35.4%
17W–31L · 46.2% of games
3.5
0%
0W–12L · 29% of games
6.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 58.3% of games
7.0
56%
14W–11L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history106 matches
W
Moon-Hui Choi / Elizabeth Templeton
2023-10-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Miriam Pasimio
0.001better than expected — took 75% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Annie Bergman / Carol Adamschamps
2023-09-17 · #3 Doubles · with Babette Gollier
+0.014better than expected — took 46% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
Gloria Carpenter / Nancy Thompsonchamps
2023-09-16 · #3 Doubles · with Babette Gollier
0.033below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Becky Wilcox / Sheila Schaubchamps
2023-09-16 · #2 Doubles · with Babette Gollier
+0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Chris Peterson / Elizabeth Westchamps
2023-09-15 · #2 Doubles · with Babette Gollier
0.033below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Jessica Berger / Mari Valvo
2023-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonya Ladd
+0.028about as expected — took 31% of games against 27% expected
6-3, 3-1
L
2023-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Beecroft
0.090below expectation — took 20% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Stertzer
0.017below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Patricia Braganza / Deborah O'Connor
2023-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marisela Giordano
0.041below expectation — took 53% of games against 68% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2023-04-19 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Reilly
0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Monica Taylor / Kathryn Wilson
2023-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sonya Ladd
+0.044better than expected — took 59% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2023-04-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Miriam Pasimio
+0.039better than expected — took 71% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.