← Search

Diana Costa

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Glendale, CA
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 9W–29L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history38 matches
L
2024-12-07 · SFV - Racketeers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine O'Neal
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-16 · SFV - Racketeers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine O'Neal
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2024-08-24 · SFV - Racketeers 55+ · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tes MacAraya
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-09 · SFV - Racketeers 55+ · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tes MacAraya
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-08-03 · SFV - Racketeers 55+ · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Yvonne Brooks
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-27 · SFV - Racketeers 55+ · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Johnson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-26 · SFV - Racketeers 55+ · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Johnson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2022-10-09 · SFV - Racketeers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathleen Johnson
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2022-10-01 · SFV - Racketeers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valerie Gilliam
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-09-10 · SFV - Racketeers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gladys Gravelis
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2021-06-06 · SFV Racketeers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margie Englis
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2021-06-05 · SFV Racketeers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liberty Peralta
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
25%
7W–21L · 41.5% of games
6.0
0%
0W–5L · 16.7% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe