← Search

Lynn Davis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Collierville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
256 matches · 97W–159L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history256 matches
W
2026-10-04 · Hyde/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gloria Hicks
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-10-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Reddin championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-20 · Echols/ Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stacey Hyde
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-13 · Echols/ Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nelli Golmeeva
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-12 · Davis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Reddin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Conrad/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maria Dannemiller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-23 · Conrad/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cristy Buziak
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · Davis/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Reddin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-16 · Conrad/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Reddin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
Default
2026-07-31 · Hollis/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerry Vaughn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-20 · Conrad/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tricia Pickett
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · Hollis/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Whitmire mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams92 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 66.2% of games
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.8% of games
3.5
71.4%
15W–6L · 60.3% of games
4.0
32.4%
34W–71L · 44.5% of games
4.5
0%
0W–22L · 23.1% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.7% of games
7.5
43.5%
20W–26L · 47.3% of games
8.5
12.5%
2W–14L · 33.2% of games
4.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 44.8% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
108 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
58 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe