← Search

Courtney Woodmansee

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Memphis, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 110W–108L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history218 matches
W
2026-10-24 · Alexander/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia House
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-18 · Fly/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Whitney Kilroy
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-04 · Fly/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Johnson
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-26 · Gilless/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Audrey Thieffry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-23 · Gilless/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tonia Gardner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-18 · Gilless/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsay Adams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · Carro/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Barrett
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · Carro/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Schnacke
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · Johnson/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Wiuff
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-07 · Carro/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Wiuff
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · Johnson/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Schnacke
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-24 · Carro/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Schnacke
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.7% of games
3.0
60%
18W–12L · 54.8% of games
3.5
56%
56W–44L · 51.1% of games
4.0
15.2%
5W–28L · 34.2% of games
5.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 73.5% of games
6.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 57.3% of games
7.5
20%
2W–8L · 44.3% of games
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 38.8% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
54 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer