← Search

Tonia Gardner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Memphis, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 114W–37L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history151 matches
L
2026-08-23 · Gilless/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Courtney Woodmansee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · Johnson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gilless
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · Johnson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gilless
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · Burbank/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gilless
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · Dent/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gilless
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-21 · Burbank/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gilless
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martha Saab championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-13 · Burbank/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Gilless
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-13 · Burbank/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Arlie Hanigan-Walters
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-13 · Flanders/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shanna Eason
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-23 · Flanders/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Gilless
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-08-10 · Gilless/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Gilless
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
90%
18W–2L · 76.8% of games
3.0
82.1%
23W–5L · 64.5% of games
3.5
76.7%
23W–7L · 61.9% of games
4.0
54.5%
18W–15L · 50.6% of games
5.5
100%
10W–0L · 78.3% of games
6.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 62.1% of games
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.8% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
35 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer