Search

Kathleen Uhlhorn

year-end
47 matches · 31W–16L · seasons 20242026

Captains: add Kathleen Uhlhorn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Gill/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deise Berger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-11 · Gill/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paige Lonergan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-14 · Glasgow/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Friary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · Glasgow/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Finks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · Glasgow/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · Glasgow/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Finks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-23 · Glasgow/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Heflin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-08 · Glasgow/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-01 · Glasgow/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dena Mullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-06 · Carlisle/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Lovell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-30 · Carlisle/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hobson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-04-01 · Carlisle/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hobson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
71%
22W–9L · 57% of games
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 61.6% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer