← Search

Kimberlee Curley

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 46W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kimberlee Curley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
L
2026-07-06 · LSullivan (Raintree) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-22 · LSullivan (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Staci Wittek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · LSullivan (Raintree) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vicky Shannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-23 · KCurley/LSullivan (Raintree) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-21 · JAckerlund (Raintree) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · SChandler/Eggers (Raintree) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-14 · JAckerlund (Raintree) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-13 · SChandler/Eggers (Raintree) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-27 · SChandler/Eggers (Raintree) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-24 · JAckerlund (Raintree) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Elizabeth Murphy / Karen Lindquist
2026-03-11 · SWittek (Raintree) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Staci Wittek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-10 · JAckerlund (Raintree) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
43.8%
32W–41L · 50% of games
3.5
10%
1W–9L · 33.7% of games
5.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 41% of games
6.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 48% of the time
#1 Singles
48%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#2 Singles
13%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
10 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams