Search

Edward Lang

Vancouver, WA
4.0S year-end 2026
28 matches · 19W–9L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.81
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 4.0
3 of 23
WA · 4.0
162 of 960

Edward is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Edward has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.0201920212026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 69.8% of games
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 57.5% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history28 matches
L
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Cronn
+0.010about as expected — took 43% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Cronn
+0.063better than expected — took 71% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Cronn
0.011about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
C Collins / Juan Imazu
2021-11-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Hergenhan
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-1
L
Jason Hall / Jeff Mosier
2021-11-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Hill
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-4
L
Emerson Clark / David Joneschamps
2021-08-29 · #1 Doubles · with Walt Crate
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2021-08-28 · #1 Doubles · with Walt Crate
0.026below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2021-08-27 · #1 Doubles · with Walt Crate
+0.026better than expected — took 86% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Dave Ketchum / DaeGoon Leechamps
2021-08-27 · #1 Doubles · with Walt Crate
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-4
W
2021-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Walt Crate
+0.029better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2021-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Walt Crate
+0.013better than expected — took 65% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2021-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Walt Crate
+0.034better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.