← Search

Melissa Jansson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sherman Oaks, CA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 52W–53L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history105 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Mixed Acers/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anton Goldman mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-04 · Mixed Acers/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hrag Kopooshian mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-12 · Mixed Acers/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hrag Kopooshian mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-19 · 7.0 Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lee Tsai mixed
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · 7.0 Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Gasper mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-31 · 7.0 Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Gasper mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · 7.0 Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Gasper mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-14 · 7.0Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Gasper mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-03-08 · 7.0Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Archer Nishioka mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-07 · 7.0Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jose MacKinney mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-25 · 7.0Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jose MacKinney mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · 7.0Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jose MacKinney mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
39.1%
18W–28L · 46.2% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.2% of games
0.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 41.2% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.6% of games
7.0mixed
67.7%
21W–10L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
18 matches
#1 Singles
15%
16 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams