← Search

Shara Wolfe

KIHEI, HI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
196 matches · 145W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shara Wolfe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history196 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Tennis Addicts · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nobuo Kitayama mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · Serving Smiles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Reid Bowman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · Serving Smiles · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Iredale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-11 · Tennis Addicts · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nobuo Kitayama mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-01 · Group Therapy · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Kanahele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · Wunder Women · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tesha Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Efren Villon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Brendon Velasco championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Chad Shibuya championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · Wunder Women · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-07 · Wunder Women · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with shar martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-06 · Group Therapy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Kanahele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
92.3%
12W–1L · 75% of games
3.5
70.6%
36W–15L · 58.3% of games
4.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.6% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
89.5%
34W–4L · 64.2% of games
7.5mixed
60%
9W–6L · 53.5% of games
8.0mixed
69.6%
16W–7L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
68 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
51 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer