← Search

Tesha Newman

Makawao, HI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 86W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tesha Newman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
W
2026-08-08 · Serving Smiles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Iredale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-08-01 · Serving Smiles · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Iredale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Karla Nutt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Diane Chaves championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-04 · Wunder Women · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eveline Wunder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-27 · Wunder Women · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shara Wolfe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-13 · Wunder Women · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Singlehurst-kapisi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · Wunder Women · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Lam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · with Carolyn Flam Sharp championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-3
L
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · with Rebecca Jakeway championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-9
W
2026-05-09 · Double Trouble · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karla Nutt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · MCC Team Spirit · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
70.6%
36W–15L · 58.9% of games
4.0
31.8%
7W–15L · 42.6% of games
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 63.1% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 58.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
15W–5L · 63% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
23 matches
#1 Singles
10%
14 matches
#1 Female Doubles
9%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer