Search

Darreon Day

Beaverton, OR
3.5C year-end 2023
16 matches · 7W–9L · seasons 20192023
Where Darreon sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Darreon is one of 1159 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 59% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams5 teams · 2018–2023
LOTC-Johnson/Lumetta
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2023
GFU-Ferrer/Jarvis (7.0)
2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2021
CRRC-Jarvis
2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2020
CRRC-Jarvis/Nguyen
2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2019
CRRC-Jarvis
2018 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2018
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Darreon has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
50%
7W–7L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history16 matches
W
2023-03-26 · LOTC-Johnson/Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Morgan
0.023below expectation — took 60% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2023-03-18 · LOTC-Johnson/Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Lei
0.013about as expected — took 48% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-02-26 · LOTC-Johnson/Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Morgan
0.057below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Austin Migchelbrink / Trong Tong
2023-02-12 · LOTC-Johnson/Lumetta · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Johnson
0.023below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Jonathan Hong / Joyce Wangmixed
2020-11-08 · GFU-Ferrer/Jarvis (7.0) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Madeleine Maier
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2020-10-18 · GFU-Ferrer/Jarvis (7.0) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Madeleine Maier
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
Marc Gonzales / Jonathan Harms
2020-03-07 · CRRC-Jarvis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Tracy
+0.005better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Brett Warren / Douglas Walker
2020-02-08 · CRRC-Jarvis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Bender
0.001about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2020-02-01 · CRRC-Jarvis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Culver
+0.002about as expected — took 57% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Dean Dordevic / Darren Malinoski
2020-01-25 · CRRC-Jarvis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Cremer
+0.023better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2019-03-30 · CRRC-Jarvis/Nguyen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Tracy
0.016below expectation — took 47% of games against 56% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
N/A
2019-03-24 · CRRC-Jarvis/Nguyen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Russell Homewood
+0.029better than expected — took 100% of games against 72% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.