Search

Madeleine Maier

Beaverton, OR
3.5C year-end 2024
26 matches · 8W–18L · seasons 20192025
Where Madeleine sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Madeleine is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Madeleine has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Madeleine has gone from the 35th to the 90th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 48.9% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 30.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history26 matches
L
2024-10-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Juan Arenas
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
Jan Wei Lim / Becky Holzmanmixed
2024-09-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Spencer Byrd
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-03-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Paulsen
+0.050better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Caroline Hall / Elizabeth Burns
2024-02-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Walker
0.005about as expected — took 44% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-01-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Paulsen
0.071below expectation — took 25% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2022-04-01 · #2 Doubles · with Sara Swanborn
0.034below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2022-03-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Swanborn
0.003about as expected — took 62% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2022-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendi Ouellette
+0.042better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2022-01-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Swanborn
+0.018better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-01-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Swanborn
+0.034better than expected — took 72% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
2022-01-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Swanborn
+0.049better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2022-01-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Walker
+0.008about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.