← Search

Katie Moe

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Minneapolis, MN
— year-end
15 matches · 11W–4L · seasons 2019–2021
Match history15 matches
L
2021-07-22 · Van Ness/Vogt- ECC Women's 3.0 Team 2021 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Wyatt
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2021-07-08 · Van Ness/Vogt- ECC Women's 3.0 Team 2021 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deirdre Palmer
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2021-07-01 · Van Ness/Vogt- ECC Women's 3.0 Team 2021 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Hardt
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2021-06-24 · Van Ness/Vogt- ECC Women's 3.0 Team 2021 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Williamson
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2021-06-10 · Van Ness/Vogt- ECC Women's 3.0 Team 2021 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mara Rendi
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2021-06-03 · Van Ness/Vogt- ECC Women's 3.0 Team 2021 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Williamson
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2019-11-01 · ICT Yorsh 10:30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Betsy Johnson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2019-10-04 · ICT Yorsh 10:30 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tricia Rubenstein
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2019-09-20 · ICT Yorsh 10:30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Betsy Johnson
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2019-07-18 · Potter- ECC USTA 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with MELISSA RINGLE
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2019-07-11 · Potter- ECC USTA 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Gunther
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2019-06-20 · Potter- ECC USTA 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Vogt
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
Teams4 teams · 2019–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
3 matches
#1 Singles
7%
1 match
#4 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer