← Search

James King

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2024
60 matches · 19W–41L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.85
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
97%
stay 3.0
3%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.80. Lower than today’s 2.85 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
176 of 357
OR · 3.0
295 of 600

James is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

James has been a steady 3.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.020192022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, James has gone from the 19th to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
31.7%
13W–28L · 44.1% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 45.6% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 48.1% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Morris
+0.025better than expected — took 59% of games against 47% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.023better than expected — took 47% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Zachary Roldan Mendenhall
2026-05-08 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.057better than expected — took 42% of games against 24% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Andrew Kullick / Kevin Segal
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Luis Ortiz
−0.069below expectation — took 8% of games against 46% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Tamarsh Abeysekera
2026-03-29 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.072better than expected — took 92% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Chris Martell
2026-03-22 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.039below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-07 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.033better than expected — took 50% of games against 37% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Danny Peter / Joseph M Heffernan III
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Crawford
−0.014below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Chris Burke
2026-02-22 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.007below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-14 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.018better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-23 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Richard Lester / Donna Parsonschamps
2024-09-21 · #3 Doubles · with Sally Murdoch
+0.009about as expected — took 45% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.