Search

Andrew Kullick

Vancouver, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
33 matches · 19W–14L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.91
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
86%
stay 3.0
14%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.85. Lower than today’s 2.91 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 3.0
17 of 52
WA · 3.0
407 of 755

Andrew is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams9 teams · 2023–2026
ET-Tanca
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2026
ET-Rencher
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2026
ET-Kullick/Lee
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men
2025
ET-Tanca
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2025
ET-OneDoubles 2.5
2024 One Doubles · 2.5 Men
2024
N OR-ET-Kullick
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Andrew has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Andrew has gone from the 39th to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
60%
9W–6L · 57.7% of games
3.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 52% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history33 matches
W
Trask Court / Paul Morris
2026-05-30 · ET-Rencher · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jay Waters
0.041below expectation — took 48% of games against 65% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-10 · ET-Rencher · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.048better than expected — took 72% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
Luis Ortiz / James King
2026-04-26 · ET-Rencher · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Segal
+0.068better than expected — took 92% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Joseph M Heffernan III / Luke Burke
2026-04-19 · ET-Rencher · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Segal
+0.017about as expected — took 40% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-11-16 · ET-Tanca · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elena Walker
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-11-09 · ET-Tanca · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elena Walker
+0.000better than expected — took 68% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Douglas Bennett / Sam Habibi
2025-05-17 · ET-Tanca · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hao Lee
+0.047better than expected — took 80% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-04-27 · ET-Tanca · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Choi
+0.046better than expected — took 50% of games against 33% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-13 · ET-Tanca · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Travis Hendricks
0.036below expectation — took 8% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-03-09 · ET-Kullick/Lee · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shad Pharaon
+0.013about as expected — took 35% of games against 34% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-02-23 · ET-Kullick/Lee · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abhisar Gupta
+0.081better than expected — took 71% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Scott Soot / Todd Rice
2025-02-08 · ET-Kullick/Lee · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Hoyt
+0.049better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.