← Search

Jaime Saclayan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hercules, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 34W–24L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history58 matches
L
2025-04-08 · PINOLE PK 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Albert Chu
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-04-03 · PINOLE PK 65AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ed Wong
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-03-11 · PINOLE PK 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Snowden
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-03-05 · PINOLE PK 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kurt Haworth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-02-03 · PINOLE PK 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Snowden
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-05-26 · PINOLE PK 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Dry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2024-05-15 · PINOLE PK 55AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Mccormick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2024-05-12 · PINOLE PK 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Dry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-04-24 · PINOLE PK 55AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Oliver McClory
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
W
2024-04-11 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 65AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brent Green
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-03-26 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brent Green
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
L
2024-03-22 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 65AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Kilbreth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 58.1% of games
7.0
53.3%
16W–14L · 50.3% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer