← Search

Shaohua Yan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Brentwood, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 6W–13L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history19 matches
L
2026-02-23 · TRILOGY 65AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey P Olson
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-04 · TRILOGY 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Schapira
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-02 · TRILOGY 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chip Sharpe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
W
2025-03-24 · TRILOGY 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chip Sharpe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-03 · TRILOGY 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Cezar
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-02-24 · TRILOGY 65AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chip Sharpe
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-03 · TRILOGY 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Cezar
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-04-11 · TRILOGY 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Cezar
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-04-10 · TRILOGY 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Cezar
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-04-08 · TRILOGY 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Schapira
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-05 · TRILOGY 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Schapira
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-04-01 · TRILOGY 65AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Schapira
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 42.3% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 27.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert