← Search

Mandy Meek

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Conway, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
224 matches · 139W–85L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history224 matches
W
2026-10-19 · Altrui/LR/Reb · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mitsy Tharp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-10-12 · Baker/DGarretson/LR/BP · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Ford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-24 · Baker/DGarretson/LR/BP · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Malika Rowan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-16 · Baker/DGarretson/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Ford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-15 · Altrui/LR/Reb · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Yun Young
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-31 · Baker/DGarretson/LR/BP · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Ford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · Baker/DGarretson/LR/BP · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca Foster
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-6
L
2026-06-14 · Stanley/Sisco/Lane/Sherwood/BP · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sydney Breaker championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-13 · Stanley/Sisco/Lane/Sherwood/BP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Althoff championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-06-12 · Stanley/Sisco/Lane/Sherwood/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Feng championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · Stanley/Sisco/Lane/Sherwood/BP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sydney Breaker
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-27 · Stanley/Sisco/Lane/Sherwood/BP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Lane
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.25
100%
4W–0L · 92.3% of games
2.5
89.5%
17W–2L · 68.9% of games
2.75
60%
3W–2L · 55.7% of games
3.0
77.8%
28W–8L · 65.4% of games
3.25
66.7%
10W–5L · 50.9% of games
3.5
46.4%
26W–30L · 48% of games
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 40.8% of games
5.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 64.5% of games
6.5
57.6%
19W–14L · 53.4% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.6% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 24% of the time
#1 Doubles
24%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
50 matches
#1 Singles
15%
34 matches
#2 Singles
11%
24 matches
#3 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova