← Search

Eric Halvorson

Bend, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 67W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eric Halvorson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
L
2026-08-10 · #2 Doubles · with Tim Ballard championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Rich Akers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Evan Harney championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rich Akers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evan Harney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-24 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-22 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackson Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-10-19 · MPRC-Gates · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Benjamin Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-09-13 · MPRC-Gates · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Gates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-23 · #1 Doubles · with Hugh Horne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-08-22 · #1 Doubles · with Hugh Horne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 63.4% of games
3.5
50.9%
29W–28L · 51.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 29.4% of games
7.0
60%
6W–4L · 54.9% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 63.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
37 matches
#1 Singles
21%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
13 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert