← Search

Brian Hartzog

Fort Mill, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 86W–58L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Brian Hartzog to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
W
2026-09-12 · MCTA18/Bhingare/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Parikshit Kanase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-18 · MCTA18/Bhingare/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rafael Balderrama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-08 · CChildress/Donoghue (Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Connell Pinckney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · CChildress/Donoghue (Matthews) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Sickles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · CChildress/Donoghue (Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Childress mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-03 · CChildress/Donoghue (Matthews) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Connell Pinckney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · CChildress/Donoghue (Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Connell Pinckney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
Don Nelson / David Oliver
2026-04-11 · MCTA55/Teat/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Teat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-04 · MCTA55/Teat/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Wozniak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-02 · MCTA40/MollT/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Moll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-28 · MCTA55/Teat/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Goetz Hagen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-21 · MCTA55/Teat/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Goetz Hagen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
64%
32W–18L · 56.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–10L · 35.8% of games
6.5
80%
12W–3L · 65.2% of games
7.5
70%
14W–6L · 53.6% of games
3.5mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.8% of games
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 44.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
22 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams